首页> 外文OA文献 >Endoscopic sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis in high risk surgical patients: A decision analysis
【2h】

Endoscopic sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis in high risk surgical patients: A decision analysis

机译:内镜下括约肌切开术联合胆囊切除术治疗胆囊切除术治疗高风险手术患者:决策分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for patients with choledocholithiasis after ERCP with sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction.Aim: We designed a decision model to address whether ES alone versus ES followed by LC (ES + LC) is the optimal treatment in high-risk patients with choledocholithiasis.Methods:Our cohort were patients with obstructive jaundice who have undergone an ES with biliary clearance. Recurrent biliary complications over a 2-year period stratified by gallbladder status (in/out) and age-stratified surgical complication rates were obtained from the literature. Failure of therapy was defined as either recurrent symptoms or death attributed to biliary complications.ResultsFor age 70–79 years, ES failed in 15% whereas ES + LC failed in 17% of cases. Mortality in the EC + LC group was 3.4 times that of the ES alone cohort. For age 80+ years, ES was dominant with an incremental success rate of 8%. Mortality in the ES + LC was 7.6 times that of ES. For age \u3c70, ES + LC was the dominant strategy with an incremental success rate 5%. Sensitivity analysis in the groups confirmed our conclusions.Conclusions:Management of choledocholithiasis by ES and stone clearance, but without cholecystectomy, should be considered for patients aged 70+. For low-risk patients, ES + LC should be performed to prevent recurrent biliary complications.
机译:背景:建议对患有括约肌切开术(ES)和结石摘除的ERCP术后胆总管结石的患者推荐进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。目的:我们设计了一种决策模型,以解决仅ES还是ES继之以LC(ES + LC)的最佳治疗方法:我们的队列为梗阻性黄疸患者,他们经胆道清除术行ES。从文献中获得了根据胆囊状态(进/出)和年龄分层的手术并发症发生率分层的2年内复发性胆道并发症。治疗失败的定义是由于胆道并发症引起的复发症状或死亡。结果在70-79岁的年龄段,ES失败者占15%,ES + LC失败者占17%。 EC + LC组的死亡率是仅ES组的3.4倍。在80岁以上的年龄段中,ES占主导地位,成功率为8%。 ES + LC中的死亡率是ES的7.6倍。对于年龄超过90岁的人群,ES + LC是主要策略,成功率增加5%。敏感性分析证实了我们的结论。结论:70岁以上的患者应考虑通过ES和结石清除治疗胆总管结石,但不行胆囊切除术。对于低危患者,应进行ES + LC预防胆道并发症的复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号